What we'd tell someone signing up for the first time: the one decision that matters, the mistake almost everyone makes, and how to spend the least money finding out what you actually like.
Last updated:
This sounds obvious and almost nobody does it. These platforms are not general-purpose products, and after using all of them the split is very clean: the ones with the best conversation have mediocre images, and the ones with the best images forget who you are within a fortnight.
So the useful question isn't which is best. It's whether you want a character who persists β the same face, the same personality, a conversation that carries on β or whether you mostly want good pictures. Answer that and the shortlist collapses to two or three.
If you want persistence, you're looking at Nomi or Kindroid. If you want pictures, you're looking at a dedicated generator. If you want a bit of everything without managing several accounts, that's SweetDream, OurDream or Candy AI.
Buying a companion platform because its feature list mentions image generation. Bundled generation is almost always weaker than a dedicated tool at the same money, and on the platforms that meter it with tokens it also ends up costing more.
We've done this ourselves. If images are the point, buy something that only does images. You'll get better output and a more predictable bill.
Most 'free tiers' in this category are trials engineered to stop exactly where it gets interesting. Three are not: Janitor AI gives around 50 messages a day on its built-in model, CrushOn AI gives 50 a day with no card, and PornPen lets you generate watermarked images without paying anyone.
That's enough to answer the only question that matters at this stage β do you actually enjoy this, or did you like the idea of it. A surprising number of people find out it's the second one, and it's much cheaper to find out for free.
The annual discounts are steep, often 50β65%, and they are genuinely good value if you stay. The catch is that this category is volatile: platforms swap the model underneath you, change what's allowed, and occasionally close. We've watched a companion's personality change overnight more than once.
So pay monthly for the first month even though it's worse value. If you're still using it after four weeks, switch to annual then β you'll have lost a few dollars and avoided the much larger version of the same mistake.
Because nothing leads at both conversation and images, plenty of people end up with one of each. If you go that way, the cheapest sensible pairing is a strong chat platform on an annual plan plus a flat-priced image generator β that avoids paying token costs twice, which is where this gets expensive without you noticing.
It's still usually less than one premium subscription plus top-ups.
Decide which single thing you care most about, then optimise for that and accept the trade-off everywhere else. Platforms in this category are not general-purpose: the ones with the best conversation have weak image generation, and the ones with the best images forget who you are after two weeks. Trying to find one that leads in everything wastes money on subscriptions you cancel. Start with a free tier that actually lets you judge output β Janitor AI, CrushOn AI and PornPen all have real ones.
If you want pictures, a dedicated generator will serve you better and cost less. If you want a character who persists β the same face, the same personality, a conversation that continues β you want a companion platform, because generators do not maintain identity across sessions. The mistake people make is buying a companion platform for its bundled image generation, which is almost always weaker than a dedicated tool at the same price.
Two are usable rather than teasers. Janitor AI gives around 50 messages a day free on its built-in model, and lets you connect your own API key for much better quality. CrushOn AI gives 50 free messages a day with no card, though free users get rate-limited at peak times. Among image generators, PornPen's free tier is watermarked and queued but sufficient to judge output before paying. Most other 'free tiers' are trials designed to stop right where it gets interesting.
Commonly, yes β usually one conversation-focused platform and one image generator, because no single product leads at both. If you go that route, the cheapest sensible pairing is a strong chat platform on an annual plan plus a dedicated generator with flat pricing, which avoids paying token costs twice.
We signed up to all fourteen platforms without paying. Three free tiers are genuinely usable, most are demos that stop exactly where it gets interesting, and two platforms have nothing at all.
Read postThe same generator is almost never good at both styles, and picking by style narrows fourteen platforms to two or three faster than any score does. What each end of the category is actually good at.
Read postThe flattening is real, it happens on almost every platform, and it has three separate causes that people usually blame on one. What we found across thirty-day tests, and the two platforms it does not happen to.
Read postSix platforms do voice and only some of them do real-time calling. Latency is the entire experience, voice messages and voice calls are different products, and on token platforms speech is quietly expensive.
Read postAppearance and personality are two different systems behind one form, they behave completely differently, and almost everyone spends their time on the one that matters less.
Read postFive of fourteen ship a real mobile app, and the reason is app store policy rather than engineering. What you actually lose in the browser, and why an icon on your home screen is a disclosure.
Read postWhat changed this year across fourteen platforms: prices settled, the quality split hardened into two separate products, memory became the real differentiator, and video arrived without being ready.
Read post
